ISSUE 02THURSDAY, JUNE 4, 2026PRINT 06.2026

GEOMDIGEST

THE INSIDER PUBLICATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY & DESIGN

GEOMDIGEST / PAPERS / CLOSED-LOOP-CONTROL-OF-DIRECT-INK-WRITING-VIA-REINFORCEMENT-LEARNING-2022-611162
No code

Closed-loop control of direct ink writing via reinforcement learning

2022 / ACM Transactions on Graphics / DOI 10.1145/3528223.3530144

Enabling additive manufacturing to employ a wide range of novel, functional materials can be a major boost to this technology. However, making such materials printable requires painstaking trial-and-error by an expert operator, as they typically tend to exhibit peculiar rheological or hysteresis properties. Even in the case of successfully finding the process parameters, there is no guarantee of print-to-print consistency due to material differences between batches. These challenges make closed-loop feedback an attractive option where the process parameters are adjusted on-the-fly. There are several challenges for designing an efficient controller: the deposition parameters are complex and highly coupled, artifacts occur after long time horizons, simulating the deposition is computationally costly, and learning on hardware is intractable. In this work, we demonstrate the feasibility of learning a closed-loop control policy for additive manufacturing using reinforcement learning. We show that approximate, but efficient, numerical simulation is sufficient as long as it allows learning the behavioral patterns of deposition that translate to real-world experiences. In combination with reinforcement learning, our model can be used to discover control policies that outperform baseline controllers. Furthermore, the recovered policies have a minimal sim-to-real gap. We showcase this by applying our control policy in-vivo on a single-layer printer using low and high viscosity materials.

42
Citations
30
References
0
Implementations
No evidence
Repro status

Reproducibility Dossier

No evidenceConfidence: automated / checked Apr 2026

GEOMDIGEST treats reproducibility as an evidence trail: public artifacts, documentation, data, packaging, archival stability, and verification checks. Numeric scores are only exposed for audited records; public pages prioritize the evidence itself.

0
Evidence
0
Verified
not yet
Code
not yet
Data
not yet
Docs
not yet
Build checks
No public reproducibility evidence has been attached yet. Editors can add code, data, documentation, package, demo, benchmark, archive, or supplement links.
Methodology
Improve this dossier

Implementation Index

No implementations indexed yet

This paper is in the knowledge graph, but we have not attached a runnable artifact yet.

Citation Lineage

Lineage not indexed yet

This paper is in the knowledge graph, but no in-corpus reference or citing-paper links have been attached yet.