ISSUE 02THURSDAY, JUNE 4, 2026PRINT 06.2026

GEOMDIGEST

THE INSIDER PUBLICATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY & DESIGN

GEOMDIGEST / PAPERS / INFLUENCE-OF-CENTER-HUNG-SCOREBOARD-ON-SEISMIC-RESPONSE-OF-SINGLE-LAYER-SPHERICA-2022-417297
No code

Influence of Center-Hung Scoreboard on Seismic Response of Single-Layer Spherical Reticulated Shell Under One-dimensional Horizontal Earthquake

2022 / Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures / DOI 10.20898/j.iass.2022.004

The center-hung scoreboard is large-scale display device flexibly suspended in the center of the gymnasium. The influence of center-hung scoreboard on seismic response of single-layer spherical reticulated shell is not clear. In this paper, the FEA models of coupling systems composed of single-layer spherical reticulated shell and center- hung scoreboard are established. The seismic responses of coupling systems are calculated by explicit dynamic time history method. The seismic responses of the coupling systems are compared between the flexibly suspended case and the simplified case where the scoreboard is simplified as fixed mass of the support platform. The effects of the sling length and the scoreboard weight on seismic responses of the coupling systems are also discussed. Compared with the simplified case, peak values of displacements, accelerations and axial force are significantly different when the scoreboard is flexibly suspended. The treatment method of simplifying the scoreboard as fixed mass of the support platform is dangerous. The sling length and the scoreboard weight have significant effects on peak values of displacements, accelerations and axial forces of the coupling systems. The envelope values under different sling lengths and different weight should be taken as seismic response results for structural design.

0
Citations
1
References
0
Implementations
No evidence
Repro status

Reproducibility Dossier

No evidenceConfidence: automated / checked Apr 2026

GEOMDIGEST treats reproducibility as an evidence trail: public artifacts, documentation, data, packaging, archival stability, and verification checks. Numeric scores are only exposed for audited records; public pages prioritize the evidence itself.

0
Evidence
0
Verified
not yet
Code
not yet
Data
not yet
Docs
not yet
Build checks
No public reproducibility evidence has been attached yet. Editors can add code, data, documentation, package, demo, benchmark, archive, or supplement links.
Methodology
Improve this dossier

Implementation Index

No implementations indexed yet

This paper is in the knowledge graph, but we have not attached a runnable artifact yet.

Citation Lineage

Lineage not indexed yet

This paper is in the knowledge graph, but no in-corpus reference or citing-paper links have been attached yet.