ISSUE 02WEDNESDAY, JUNE 3, 2026PRINT 06.2026

GEOMDIGEST

THE INSIDER PUBLICATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY & DESIGN

GEOMDIGEST / PAPERS / CLASSIFICATION-AND-MECHANICAL-BEHAVIORS-OF-INNER-CONCAVE-CABLE-ARCH-STRUCTURE-WI-2023-482483
No code

Classification and Mechanical Behaviors of Inner Concave Cable-Arch Structure with V-Shape Web Struts

2023 / Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures / DOI 10.20898/j.iass.2023.005

The inner concave cable-arch structures with V-shape web struts were classified, and single-tensioning construction method and multiple-tensioning construction method for continuous cable-arch structures were described. The optimization of pretension for multiple-tensioning construction method was carried out. FE models of cable-arch structures including the single-tensioning models and the multiple-tensioning models were created. The mechanical behaviors including stress ratios, stiffness, horizontal bearing reaction force and structural stability of the two kinds of models were compared. The results show that the pretension does not significantly influence the maximum resultant displacement, horizontal bearing reaction force, and stability of the singletensioning cable-arch structures. With pretension increasing the stress ratios can be reduced. The stress ratios and stiffness decrease with the increasing of the rise-to-span ratio, and horizontal bearing reaction force slightly decreases, but structural stability has no obvious changing rules. There is no difference in mechanical behaviors between two types of cable-arch structures with the rise-to-span ratio of 0.2, it is recommended to use the singletensioning construction method. However, the mechanical behaviors of multiple-tensioning type are generally better than that of single-tensioning type with the rise-to-span ratio of 0.3 and 0.4. It is necessary to consider the cost of construction and mechanical behaviors to determine its tensioning construction method.

0
Citations
0
References
0
Implementations
No evidence
Repro status

Reproducibility Dossier

No evidenceConfidence: automated / checked Apr 2026

GEOMDIGEST treats reproducibility as an evidence trail: public artifacts, documentation, data, packaging, archival stability, and verification checks. Numeric scores are only exposed for audited records; public pages prioritize the evidence itself.

0
Evidence
0
Verified
not yet
Code
not yet
Data
not yet
Docs
not yet
Build checks
No public reproducibility evidence has been attached yet. Editors can add code, data, documentation, package, demo, benchmark, archive, or supplement links.
Methodology
Improve this dossier

Implementation Index

No implementations indexed yet

This paper is in the knowledge graph, but we have not attached a runnable artifact yet.

Citation Lineage

Lineage not indexed yet

This paper is in the knowledge graph, but no in-corpus reference or citing-paper links have been attached yet.